Original Research
In defence of partisan justice - an ethical reflection on “the preferential option for the poor”
Verbum et Ecclesia | Vol 28, No 1 | a102 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v28i1.102
| © 2007 PJ Naude
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 17 September 2007 | Published: 17 November 2007
Submitted: 17 September 2007 | Published: 17 November 2007
About the author(s)
PJ Naude, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan UniversityFull Text:
PDF (228KB)Abstract
Can one defend a form of partisan justice? This question is answered in the affirmative in the light of two broad arguments: The theological argument arises from the preferential option for the poor from Latin America, and the philosophical argument is derived from John Rawls’ notion of the least advantaged representative person and assistance due to burdened societies in a global context. In closing, a number of important implications of such a partisan notion of both distributive and cultural justice are explicated. This article is developed in three sections. The first section briefly sketches a profile of the different theological arguments underlying a preferential option for the poor as particularly developed by Latin American liberation theologians, and later accepted in wider ecumenical circles. In the second section, philosophical arguments for a position of “prioritarianism” which seems to support such “preferential option” are outlined. This is attempted via a discussion of two influential books by well-known American political philosopher , John Rawls, namely his A theory of justice (1973), and The law of
peoples (1999). Section three concludes the article by demonstrating the synergy between these theological and philosophical views, and by pointing out – in a provisional manner - the important consequences of such a “preferential” or “partisan” view for guiding ethical reflection on local and global socio-economic relations.
peoples (1999). Section three concludes the article by demonstrating the synergy between these theological and philosophical views, and by pointing out – in a provisional manner - the important consequences of such a “preferential” or “partisan” view for guiding ethical reflection on local and global socio-economic relations.
Keywords
No related keywords in the metadata.
Metrics
Total abstract views: 4083Total article views: 4374
Crossref Citations
1. The roots of the preferential option for the poor in Catholic schools in Luke's Gospel
Stephen J. McKinney
International Studies in Catholic Education vol: 10 issue: 2 first page: 220 year: 2018
doi: 10.1080/19422539.2018.1492264