Original Research - Special Collection: Reconciliation

And Zaccheus remained in the tree: Reconciliation and justice and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission

A Boesak
Verbum et Ecclesia | Vol 29, No 3 | a40 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v29i3.40 | © 2008 A Boesak | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 20 June 2008 | Published: 17 November 2008

About the author(s)

A Boesak, University of Stellenbosch

Full Text:

PDF (96KB)


And Zaccheus remained in the tree: Reconciliation and Justice and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission

South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) has been praised the world over for its work and its example is being followed by many countries, in Africa especially. In South Africa the TRC has raised hopes and expectations that went beyond the TRC’s functionality within the framework of South Africa’s political settlement and its legal mandate given by Parliament. This contribution argues that there is growing disillusionment with the work of the TRC especially among black communities and that one of the major flaws of the TRC rests in its failure to link reconciliation with justice. Justice here must not be understood within the strict legal terms that some have applied to the work of the TRC but rather from within the expectations created by the TRC itself through its own insistence that its work should be seen as a Christian endeavour. This failure has a direct bearing on the situation South Africa finds itself in today, and the author argues that a return to an understanding of reconciliation that presupposes justice will help address one of the most critical issues in our social, political and theological discourse today.


No related keywords in the metadata.


Total abstract views: 3526
Total article views: 2656


Crossref Citations

1. Radical reconciliation: The TRC should have allowed Zacchaeus to testify?
Tshepo Lephakga
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies  vol: 72  issue: 1  year: 2016  
doi: 10.4102/hts.v72i1.3120