Original Research

Comparing Pauline christology in the disputed and undisputed letters

Philip La G. Du Toit
Verbum et Ecclesia | Vol 47, No 1 | a3871 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v47i1.3871 | © 2026 Philip La G. Du Toit | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 26 March 2026 | Published: 20 May 2026

About the author(s)

Philip La G. Du Toit, The Unit of Reformational Theology and the Development of the South African Society, Faculty of Theology, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa

Abstract

One of the main issues in debates about the authenticity of the letters to the Colossians and Ephesians is their high christology in comparison with the undisputed Pauline letters, especially as portrayed in Colossians 1:15–20 and Ephesians 1:20–23. In this contribution, the main question that is asked is whether the christology in the undisputed material matches that of the disputed material, and if so, how it influences aspects of debates on authenticity.
Intradisciplinary and/or interdisciplinary implications: This is done by comparing the christological content of Colossians 1:15–20 and Ephesians 1:20–23 with the main christological passages in the undisputed Pauline letters, especially Romans 8:34; 10:6–13; 1 Corinthians 8:5–6, 15:24–28 and Philippians 2:6–11.


Keywords

Pauline theology; Pauline corpus; christology; authenticity; authorship; disputed

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 3: Good health and well-being

Metrics

Total abstract views: 437
Total article views: 720


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.