Original Research

The blunt and frank: A critique of Nelson Mandela and José Rizal for the liberative motif today

Thinandavha D. Mashau, Fides Del Castillo
Verbum et Ecclesia | Vol 47, No 1 | a3716 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v47i1.3716 | © 2026 Thinandavha D. Mashau, Fides Del Castillo | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 11 November 2025 | Published: 29 May 2026

About the author(s)

Thinandavha D. Mashau, Department of Christian Spirituality, Church History and Missiology, School of Humanities, College of Human Sciences Deanery, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa
Fides Del Castillo, Department of Christian Spirituality, Church History and Missiology, School of Humanities, College of Human Sciences Deanery, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa; and Department of Theology and Religious Education, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines

Abstract

This article provides a missional and comparative critique of Nelson Mandela and José Rizal, examining their liberative motifs in the context of Christ’s liberative mission. Thirty years into democracy in South Africa and a century after the liberation of the Philippines, the ideals of equality, justice and quality of life espoused by these historical figures remain elusive. The majority of their people continue to grapple with inequality, poverty and unemployment. This article explores the theological and missional implications of their struggles, reflecting on the unfinished work of liberation and the lessons their lives offer for contemporary generations.
Intradisciplinary and/or interdisciplinary implications: By examining their strategies, successes and shortcomings in light of the missio Dei [mission of God], this article seeks to inspire a renewed commitment to holistic liberation in the face of persistent systemic injustices.


Keywords

missio Dei; heroes; global south; missional; liberative mission

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 1: No poverty

Metrics

Total abstract views: 205
Total article views: 289


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.