The aspects of the political leadership in South Africa discussed in this article include, among others, abuse of power, corruption and lack of public accountability. In response to these aspects, the article demonstrates that servant leadership is an urgent style for the current state of political leadership in South Africa. The article discusses key aspects of the current political leadership in South Africa as a point of departure. The article also discusses the theological foundation and key principles of servant leadership in order to apply them to the current state of political leadership in South Africa
When one follows the current affairs in the politics of South Africa, one can observe that there is fear among many South Africans that South Africa may become another failed African state. Another fear among those in the liberation movement, African National Congress (ANC), is that ANC might become another failed African liberation movement. These fears are caused by the current abuse of power, corruption and lack of accountability by the executive in the South African government.
There has been an attempt through, for example, the doctrine of separation of powers to limit the abuse of power by the executive in the South African government. However, power continues to be abused at all government levels. State institutions are being used to favour one faction of the ANC over the other. Equally so there have been so many attempts to try and deal with corruption at government level, but corruption remains enemy number one to service delivery in government. Corruption manifests itself in different forms at different spheres of government. In all these predicaments, most government officials fail to account to the public. This happens when corruption and abuse of power is in the limelight for everyone to see. It is amazing that officials still have the courage to deny the truth even when that truth has already been proven in the court of law. At the end, the main problem becomes lack of accountability and responsibility for the executive’s actions.
The abuse of power, corruption and lack of public accountability call for a unique approach to public governance, management and leadership. They call for a different system that can turn governance around to make it more trustworthy and accountable. In response to these aspects, the article demonstrates that servant leadership is an urgent style for the current state of political leadership in South Africa. The article discusses key aspects of the current political leadership in South Africa as a point of departure. The article also discusses the theology and principles of servant leadership in order to apply them to the current state of political leadership in South Africa.
When the interim constitution
The government uses the doctrine of separation of powers to prevent the abuse of power by the executive. The main objective of the doctrine of separation of powers
The other problem is that the mechanisms put in place to prevent abuse of power are sometimes inadequate. As a result, this offers fertile ground for misconduct and abuse of power. Irrespective of the legal requirements, many South African government officials abuse their power. The present government’s democratisation and restructuring processes that took place without adequate control mechanisms have opened new avenues for abuse of power, mainly in the regional administrations that embody a legacy from the ‘homeland’ civil services (Habtemichael
The abuse of power in the current political leadership, for example, is seen by lack of consultation when making key decisions like cabinet reshuffles. The South African Communist Party’s
The second aspect of the current political leadership is corruption
In the South African context, a number of mechanisms have been put in place to limit the scope for conflicts of interest since 1994. Among these mechanisms is the compulsion for all senior managers, as well as officials working in procurement, to declare any financial and business interests. Recently, there has been an improvement in timeous submission of disclosure forms by senior managers to the Public Service Commission (PSC), from 47% in 2009/2010 to 84% in 2013/2014 (PSC report
However, corruption continues to thrive even in the midst of these mechanisms. Global Financial Integrity said in a report that South Africa had suffered an illegal outflow of R185 billion owing to corruption in the public sector between 1994 and 2008 (News24
There is evidence of corruption in the current political leadership as contained in the state capture report. The report confirms South Africa’s worst fears about corruption: that the state has been captured. In 355 pages, former public protector Thuli Madonsela and her team of investigators outline in detail just how much control the Gupta family, a wealthy Indian immigrant family, has over South Africa’s resources. President Jacob Zuma, the Guptas’ close friend, and his son Duduzane as well as two ministers are implicated in the report (Quartz media
The same former public protector issued the report on an investigation into allegations of impropriety and unethical conduct relating to the installation and implementation of security measures by the Department of Public Works at and in respect of the private residence of President Jacob Zuma at Nkandla in KwaZulu-Natal. She found that Zuma had unduly benefited from the upgrades. She therefore recommended that Zuma must pay for the non-security upgrades at his home, which include a visitors’ centre, an amphitheatre, a swimming pool, a cattle kraal, a culvert, a chicken run and extensive paving (The citizen
The bigger problem of the current political leadership is that there is no public accountability. Public accountability pertains to the obligations of persons or entities entrusted with public resources to be answerable for the fiscal, managerial and programme responsibilities that have been conferred on them, and to report to those that have conferred these responsibilities. From this definition of public accountability, it is clear that the public entities that utilise public resources have an obligation to account for the way these resources are allocated, used and the outcomes this spending has achieved. In other words, the main objectives of all public accountability initiatives are to ensure that public money is spent most economically and efficiently, that there is a minimum of wastage or theft and finally that public actually benefits from public finance (Khan & Chowdhury
Securing accountability
When the former president, Jacob Zuma, was summoned to the parliament of the republic to account to the public on urgent matters like the Nkandla and state capture reports, he did not give precise answers that demonstrate accountability. These relate to Zuma’s alleged role in awarding contracts and jobs to his family members and close associates. The president has become a master at evading questions, specifically ones that cause any sense of discomfort. All he would say on these matters is that he was taking legal advice about setting up a commission of inquiry into allegations of state capture to ‘see how far it goes’ (EWN
The primary biblical texts that talk about servant leadership are Matthew 20:20–28 and Mark 10:35–45, both of which include comments by Jesus regarding leadership and servanthood. There are various other scriptures that illustrate the quintessential servant leadership of Jesus. Among the important supplementary scriptures are the Servant Songs of Isaiah, Luke 22:25–30 (additional comments by Jesus about leadership), and John 13:1–17 (the story of Jesus washing his disciples’ feet). All these scriptures provide a meaningful theological foundation from which to substantiate and advance the servant leadership concept (Russell
Gene Wilkes’ book on servant leadership also developed the seven principles of servant leadership by using the text in Mark 10:45, Luke 22:25–30, Matthew 20:20–28 and John 13:1–17. Jesus humbled himself and allowed God to exalt him. Jesus followed his father’s will rather than seeking a position. Jesus defined greatness as being a servant first. Jesus risked serving others because he trusted that he was God’s son. Jesus left his place at the head of the table to serve the needs of others. Jesus shared responsibility and authority with those he called to lead. Jesus built a team to carry out a worldwide vision (Wilkes
Philippians 2:5–11, also known as the hymn of Christ, has according to Collange (
Geisler (
Nebreda (
Moessner (
The rationale behind this teaching on service is that ‘the authoritative one is the one who serves, and the proof of that authority is in the service rendered on behalf of others’. Thus, the ‘greatness’ of a disciple is directly proportional to the degree of service he or she renders unto others. That is the heart of the paradox, which the disciples fail to comprehend. It is the reason that they find it difficult to accept this paradoxical nature to discipleship. They cannot conceive that true greatness is measured according to one’s servility. They must undergo a change of mindset to understand discipleship as service and not in positions of ruling power (Cox
Jesus is asking his disciples to be different from the worldly system of leadership. ‘It shall not be so among you’, in other words, the disciples should not lead like Gentile rulers. They should not lead by exercising authority or by exercising lordship over others. Jesus introduces a style different from what the disciples already know as the norm. In contrast, to exercising authority and exercising lordship, they should minister and serve others.
A servant leader does not simply serve but makes followers independent and capable and desirous of serving other people. They embrace the spirit of servant leadership, the spirit of moral authority (Covey
There are four roles of servant leadership. The leader must first be a model of credibility, diligence, and the spirit of servant leadership. The second role of leadership is path finding, wherein a vision is discerned. The third role is that of alignment; unless you institutionalise your values, they will not happen. The fourth role is to empower people; the fruit of the three other roles (Walls
Servant leadership has the potential for maximising empowerment participation because it supremely values the importance of each individual. Servant leadership is the antithesis of marginalisation (Echols
Servant leader does not avoid leadership. Instead, it is a different kind of leadership, one committed to meeting the needs of others. Similar to the 1st century slaves, true servant leaders give up their rights for the sake of others. True greatness and true leadership is achieved not by reducing men to one’s service, but in giving oneself in selfless service to them (Hutchison
Furthermore, they think more about others than themselves; they think like stewards, not owners; and they think about their work, not what others are doing. True servants base their identity on Christ, and they think of ministry as an opportunity, not an obligation. The true spiritual leader is concerned infinitely more with the service to God and fellow men than with the benefits and pleasures of life. A servant leader aims to put more into life than taking out of it. A true servant leader is a spirit-led leader.
The servant leader is tough in love and in spirit. The servant leader is willing to walk that extra mile, give and engage fully in the well-being of the organisation and followers. This will sometimes mean having to face the idea of loving the unlovable, and yet, for the servant leader, this concept is a misnomer in that all people are worthy human beings, deserving of love and respect (Tan
Servant leaders demand to serve and acquire a position later. They seek to minister first and become great because of hearts to serve. Take, for example, a waiter in a restaurant; he or she directs the customers to the table first (e.g. table for two or three), serves the customer and gets ‘benefits’ later. Another good example is that of a petrol station attendant who normally asks the motorists what type of fuel they use, performs other duties like checking oil levels and pouring water into the engine, washes the windscreen and asks for the payment later. This is putting service first and position and money later.
It is a challenge and a warning to all that the path that leads to true discipleship is a path that leads to servility. For only when one has enough faith and love to humbly serve others is one truly following the example set by Christ himself (Cox
Humility is when people humble themselves towards God and his purpose. Humility, like slavery, is to take the lowest place in the Kingdom of God. Humility is not thinking less of oneself. It is more than about thinking less of oneself. It is about stimulating conversations that allow people to confront the truth rather than skirting diplomatically around it. Humility is a modest view of one’s own importance. Humble leaders take a very low social rank. They are very low in dignity or importance. Humility is to obey the instruction of God at a given time or place. Humility is a positive attitude towards the life of other people.
Humble servants give up to go up. Leaders who normally take themselves up end up coming down, and when they are down they blame everybody around them. Humility requires that a leader affords followers an opportunity to express themselves. A good example in this context is ‘marriage’ – which is not an institution where one partner should feel intimidated by the other. Both partners should humble themselves and submit to one another. The correct method is not 50/50 or 100/0 but humility towards one another (see Eph 5:21–33). Both husband and wife must remain humble towards each other regardless of who is right or wrong.
An element of humility is the willingness to stand back, putting the interest of others first and facilitating their performance. It is also about modesty. The servant leader retreats into the background when a task has been successfully accomplished (Dierendonck & Patterson
Humble servants do not see themselves as experts and leaders who cannot be substituted. They are not afraid to give glory to others, even when they have done the work themselves. Servant leaders always believe in the ability of their followers. They never want to do everything but always create an opportunity for others to serve. The followers feel that they are needed and participate without fear of failure or prejudice. Humble servants believe in the team and they do not personalise victory. Thus, humble servants take responsibility for failures but never take the glory of the victory. They are not self-centred but team-oriented.
Personal humility is characterised by a compelling modesty, shunning of public adulation and never being boastful. It enables to act with quiet, calm determination, and relies principally on inspired standards than charisma (Collins
In action movies, most of the time when a fight arises, one hears words of warning like ‘get down’. When the fighters hear this word and ignore it or play smart by remaining standing, a person gets shot. The one that takes advice and stays low will be saved together with other people’s lives. It is also practical in a real-life situation, and those in the defence or police force can tell the story in a better way. Thus, the way for a servant leader to go up is to go down.
Characteristics of humble leaders are:
when they know they are not right, they concede;
they are open about their faults to others;
they are ready to ‘roll up their sleeves’ with the rest;
they do not let their opinion take precedence over others’ opinions;
they are gracious when others are praised over them;
they do not equate possessions with worth. (Heath
The steward is an overseer, a manager, a trustee, a caretaker; the steward is not the owner; Stewards are entrusted with money, vineyards, goods, property, which they are to manage for another; Stewards are called upon to be faithful, that is, to be responsible to manage in a way that the money, talents or pounds generate interest (Fransen
A steward understands that God is the owner of everything. As a result, a steward acts as an administrator of God’s property. A steward is the one who takes care of that which belongs to God because in the Kingdom of God there are no owners. The main function of the steward is to be a caretaker so that when the owner arrives everything else will be in order. Furthermore, a steward has responsibility to not only take care of the property but also to make sure that it increases in value.
Stewardship is about holding something in trust for another (Wilkes
Stewards are intrinsically motivated by higher level needs to act for the collective good of their organisation. They identify with the organisation and embrace its objectives; they are committed to make it succeed, even at the cost of personal sacrifice (Miller & Breton-Miller
Servant leaders are faithful in exercising stewardship. A faithful leader is one who has no credibility gap. When a servant leader is a steward in an organisation, they will make sure that everything is taken care of before leaving. A steward is the first person to arrive and the last to leave in an organisation. Traditional leadership sees a leader as a boss and commander who functions as an instructor and leaves afterwards. On the contrary, a servant leader is always present with the followers. The work of a steward is to make sure that everyone has been taken care of before the leader.
There are three women in the gospels who were stewards for Jesus (Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James and Jesus and the mother of Zebedee’s children). These women were the last to leave during Christ’ crucifixion and were the first to arrive at the empty grave after his resurrection (see Mk 16:1). They wanted to make sure that the grave of their Master is taken care of before they departed to their houses. On the day of the resurrection they came to inspect only to find that he resurrected.
Throughout our lives, we have been and continue to be influenced by the behaviour of others, whether it is the example set by parents, teachers, colleagues, friends, sport stars, celebrities, politicians or any other person. So, whether they like it or not, leaders lead by example. Leaders are role models; of course, people can and should make independent choices and they should not just be blind followers doing whatever the leader does but the leader’s behaviour is a reference point. A leader’s behaviour, good or bad, will affect the behaviour of others, and so clearly leaders need to focus on setting a good example to encourage positive behaviour in the people that they lead (Thatcher
One of the challenges facing leaders is how to get followers to do something they otherwise would not do. One mechanism by which a leader may influence his or her followers is through leading by example. Recent research has shown that followers respond strongly to the example set by a leader (Gächter et al.
Leading by example is what the leader needs to do to get moral authority. Even when the leader has formal authority – the power to coerce (directly or indirectly) – such authority is rarely absolute. Moreover, the people in an organisation with authority are not always, or solely, the leaders. Consider, for instance, that in many academic departments, the true leaders are often not the department chairs. Leadership is, thus, distinct from formal authority; it is, instead, an example of informal authority. The leader does not deduce his or her authority from codes and statutes, as is the case with the jurisdiction of office, nor does he deduce his authority from traditional customs or feudal vows of faith, as is the case with patrimonial power (Hermalin
There are contemporary examples of servant leadership especially in the corporate world, such as Star bucks. The -well-known company, Starbucks, aimed to make sure that they can satisfy every customer’s needs, so that its highest priority can be served through every cup of coffee. This is a good application of servant leadership to improve organisational performance. From the mission statement of Starbucks we can know that employees are being called partners. It is not just a job for them. It is their passion and lives because their needs are also being served by Starbucks. They respect each other and work tightly to increase the team’s effectiveness. Their employees are encouraged and inspired by servant leaders to contribute to the enhancement of their community. An organisation makes a contribution to its local community. As a return, the community helps that organisation thrive by supporting it (Li
Another example of servant leadership is Southwest Airlines. At Southwest, people are reminded than instructed. The company is in customer service business but just happens to fly aeroplanes. They are a company of people not a company of aeroplanes. When the company started in 1971, they had only three aeroplanes, flying between three cities in Texas, with only 12 daily flights and 198 employees. The style of servant leadership and its principles assisted them to attain 700 aeroplanes, 97 cities (U.S. and international), 3600 daily flights, 46 000 employees, number 1 domestic market share (25%), 42 consecutive years of profitability and no involuntary furloughs or layoffs as of 2014 (Southwest Airlines
Servant leadership is an urgent style for the current political leadership in South Africa because in servant leadership there is no abuse of power but only servanthood. Jesus said to his disciples that:
You know that those who are regarded as rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their high officials exercise authority over them. Not so with you. Instead, whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant. (Mk 10:42–43)
Jesus here is calling for a different system of governance that gives service to people than to lord over them and exercise authority over them.
In servant leadership, the leader does not only serve but is also selfless. One thing about corruption as discussed above is that it only benefits the leader and the followers suffer as a result. Corruption affects the poorest of the poor because they are not able to receive services. Corruption in the public administration and in political decision-making is a major enemy of those who wish to make a genuine effort to tackle the challenge of poverty (Kgatle
In servant leadership, there is public accountability. Servant leaders as stewards are able to account to their followers because they have the knowledge that public money is not their own money. They are only appointed to take care of the public purse. They will be able to account for every cent that comes in and goes out of the treasury. This is an urgently required style in South Africa because South Africa is more likely to become another failed state and the governing party is more likely to become another failed liberation movement. South Africa could face more economic downgrades which can negatively affect the economy.
The current political leadership in South Africa should learn from companies like Starbucks, Southwest Airlines and Google that servant leadership can ensure the success of an organisation. Starbucks Corporation was able to increase its profits by forming partnerships with employees, contributing to the enhancement of their community and leading by example. Similarly, Southwest Airlines was able to increase the volume of its operations, number of employees and profits by prioritising customer service rather than just flying people to different destinations.
The current political leadership in South Africa should also learn from their own former leaders such as Nelson Mandela, who gained honour and prestige through humility and service to the people of South Africa. His exalted status is not limited just to his people, but the whole world salutes him for his strength of character. His life story has attracted the international community and put South Africa on the global map. For the new generation of South Africans today, their harvest is plenty because of the sacrifices of the ‘struggle hero’. ‘The born free’ in our land have never experienced the brutal and inhumane acts of apartheid. It took principles of servant leadership to shun retaliation to the nationalist government and retreat from the armed struggle (Kgatle
The current political leaders should lead by example. The best way to deal with abuse of power, corruption and lack of accountability at a local level is for the executive to lead by example. There is no way that the executive can correct corruption if they themselves are corrupt to the core. In Northern Sotho, they say
The aspects of the current political leadership in South Africa discussed in this article call for a unique approach to public governance, management and leadership. They call for a different system that can turn governance around to make it more trustworthy and accountable. In response to these aspects, the article demonstrated that servant leadership is an urgent style for the current state of political leadership in South Africa. The article discussed key aspects of the current political leadership in South Africa as a point of departure. The article also discussed servant leadership and applied it to the current state of political leadership in South Africa. Servant leadership is proposed in this article as an urgent style for the current state of political leadership in South Africa.
The author declares that he has no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced him in writing this article.
The constitution protects and promotes the system of separation of powers although it does not refer to it explicitly. In South African Association of Personal Injury Lawyers v Heath, the Constitutional Court held that there ‘can be no doubt that our Constitution provides for such a separation [
The idea behind the doctrine of separation of powers is that a concentration of too much power in a single entity will lead to the abuse of power. The doctrine embodies a number of principles, the first of which is the formal distinction between the legislative, executive and judicial branches of government. The second is of the separation of functions which entails that each branch of government exercises distinct powers and functions. The third is that of separation of personnel, which requires that each of the different branches be staffed with different officials. Lastly, the separation of powers doctrine importantly entails the principle of checks and balances where each branch of government is entrusted with special powers designed to keep a check on the exercise of the functions of others (Sang
Jacob Gedleyihlekisa Zuma (born 12 April 1942) is a South African politician. He has served as the President of South Africa since 2009. Zuma was the President of the African National Congress (ANC) from 2007 to 2017, the governing political party, and was Deputy President of South Africa from 1999–2005. He was first elected by parliament following his party’s victory in the 2009 general election. He was re-elected in the 2014 election (Wikipedia).
The South African Communist Party was founded in 1921 and has always been in the forefront of the struggle against imperialism and racist domination. The SACP is a partner in the Tripartite Alliance consisting of the ANC and the Congress of South African Trade Union (COSATU). The Youth Wing of the SACP is the Young Communist League (YCL).
Dr Bonginkosi Emmanuel ‘Blade’ Nzimande (born 14 April 1958) is a South African politician who has been Minister for Higher Education and Training since 2009. He has been the SACP since 1998. He has a doctorate degree in philosophy, specialising in sociology. He came out strongly against proposals for nationalisation at the COSATU conference in June 2011, stating that it is not ‘inherently progressive’ as it depended on which class interests were being advanced (Wikipedia).
Corruption is an abuse of public resources and public power for private gain. However, this does not mean that it does not exist in the private sector. A lot of corruption involves a collusive relationship between the private sector and the public sector and indeed between private citizens and public officials, particularly in the area of petty corruption – traffic-cop bribery, bribery to get into housing allocation queues, et cetera. The truth remains, however, that it is not very often possible to abuse public resources and public power without the participation of members of the public sector (Lewis
Accountability is a concept in ethics and governance with several meanings. It is often used synonymously with such concepts as responsibility, answerability, blameworthiness, liability and other terms associated with the expectation of account-giving. As an aspect of governance, it has been central to discussions related to problems in the public sector, the non-profit sector and the private (corporate) world. In leadership roles, accountability is the acknowledgment and assumption of responsibility for actions, products, decisions and policies, including administration, governance and implementation within the scope of the role or employment position and encompassing the obligation to report, explain and be answerable for the resulting consequences (Maloba