Original Research

Mereological concepts for modelling parthood relations between אלהים and natural phenomena in the Hebrew Bible

Jacobus W. Gericke
Verbum et Ecclesia | Vol 37, No 1 | a1528 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v37i1.1528 | © 2016 Jacobus W. Gericke | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 03 September 2015 | Published: 23 May 2016

About the author(s)

Jacobus W. Gericke, Faculty of Humanities, Basic Sciences, Theology and Philosophy, North-West University, Vaal Triangle Campus, South Africa

Abstract

In the Hebrew Bible, some texts represent what we would call ‘natural’ phenomena as being in some way related to entities classed to be אלהים in some sense of the Hebrew term; that is, God, gods, divine, deity, etc. Although various perspectives on these relations already exist in the available research on the topic, no philosophical approach to the data has of yet been conceived. In order to facilitate the latter, this study brackets the question as to what the relations between אלהים and natural phenomena in any given biblical context actually were. Yet its contribution lies in the way it aims to offer an introductory overview of some of the potentially relevant core concepts in mereology (parthood theory in metaphysics) that may be of aid in any future attempt at modelling such relations, however they were conceived.

Intradisciplinary and/or interdisciplinary implications: This article challenges the tradition of non-philosophical discourse in Old Testament theology, particularly with reference to the relational properties of Yhwh vis-a-vis natural phenomena. Its meta-theoretical application of concepts in formal descriptive mereological analysis represents an interdisciplinary supplementation of current ways of modelling God/World in the text.

Keywords: Hebrew Bible; natural phenomena; philosophy; mereology; parthood; relations


Keywords

Hebrew Bible; natural phenomena; philosophy; mereology; parthood; relations

Metrics

Total abstract views: 3581
Total article views: 4459


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.