Original Research
Trinitarian Anthropology
Verbum et Ecclesia | Vol 29, No 1 | a14 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v29i1.14
| © 2008 J Theron
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 14 May 2008 | Published: 03 February 2008
Submitted: 14 May 2008 | Published: 03 February 2008
About the author(s)
J Theron, (Huguenot College, South AfricaFull Text:
PDF (199KB)Abstract
This article looks at the problem of the so-called “point of contact” between God and mankind, or more particularly, the relation between trinity and anthropology. Does Christian anthropology develop from the doctrine on creation, the human nature of Christ or the work of the Holy Spirit? In opposition to the current trinitarian perspectives on humanity, which mainly focus on relational similitude, the theology of the Dutch theologian, Oepke Noordmans critically resists any attempt at finding analogies between the trinity and humanity. According to him, creation is judgment of God, which has critical implications for any independent anthropology: There is no perpetuation of the incarnation in our humanity, church or liturgy after the resurrection, and the re-creative work of the Spirit does not have a point of contact with any constitutive element in our humanity. The judgment of the cross reaches from creation across history to recreation.
Keywords
No related keywords in the metadata.
Metrics
Total abstract views: 4196Total article views: 4379
Crossref Citations
1. Reading the text of 1 Kings 3:7-9 as inspirational teaching on leadership to the modern church: A hermeneutical perspective
Mogomme Alpheus Masoga
Pharos Journal of Theology issue: 104(2) year: 2023
doi: 10.46222/pharosjot.104.25