Neo-Pentecostal political activism vis-a-vis good governance in Nigeria: A theological analysis

praxis through the lens of three sub-theological disciplines, namely social gospel, political and public theologies. It is argued that the NNPA is neither based on any of the three theological sub-disciplines nor any other specific theology. Thus, this article upheld that where a struggle for good governance from a Christian perspective lacks a solid theological foundation, its approach may be counterproductive. The article then recommended the need for NNPA to evolve through a constructive theology with the adoption of some concepts from the three theological sub-disciplines, especially public theology. Intradisciplinary and/or interdisciplinary implications: This article aligns with the scope of Verbum et Ecclesia as it created a conversation around dogmatic and historical theologies, socio-political interaction and African neo-Pentecostalism.


Introduction
Political activism, which is defined by Aver'janov (1993:431) as a 'social group or individual activity, directed to change or improve social, economic, and political institutes', has become part of the activities of the Nigerian neo-Pentecostals 1 (NNP). The American Heritage Dictionary (n.d.) applies the word 'confrontation' to describe the nature of political activism. Such a description fits the NNP approach in their socio-political engagements with the government. Sadly, the politicians in some cases appear to be defiant to such a struggle. In other cases, pulpit political activism (PPA) creates conflicts between religious leaders and political elites. 2 This is evident by the attempted and actualised arrest of some pulpit activists. 3 Such pulpit activism with potential political tension, civil unrest, and church-state leadership crises reveal the loophole in the activists' approach. Thus, the crux of this article is to show that the ineffectiveness of PPA in Nigeria may be caused by the activists' theological premise. Firstly, a brief history of some pulpit activists' reactions will be presented followed by counter-reactions from the government. Thereafter, Nigerian neo-Pentecostal political activism (NNPA) will be placed under the lens of the social gospel (SG), political and public theologies. Finally, the outcome of the critique will lead to recommendations for effective PPA. governance, nepotism, tribalism, and disregard for the rule of law. It should be clear at the end of this section that some Nigerian neo-Pentecostal leaders are pulpit activists who speak 'their truth' to power when the need arises.

Tunde Bakare
The pastor of the Citadel Global Community Church (CGCC) is Tunde Bakare,a renowned lawyer. 4 He appears to be the loudest pulpit political activist in Nigeria as he continues to confront anti-democratic practices and dictatorship. The United States Department of State (1999) reports that the radical televangelist had his transmission cut off during heated criticism of the military Government's programme for a return to civilian rule, in which he alleged that the main presidential candidate would be assassinated by the armed forces. Indeed, rarely has there been any Nigerian president who escaped the criticism of Bakare. According to Odunsi (2013), Bakare stated that 'former President Abdulsalami looted more than Abacha and Obasanjo is no better' (Odunsi 2013). These were three military Presidents consistently criticised by Bakare. Also, Agbenson (2014:2) accounts that Bakare was the convener of Save Nigeria Group (SNG), a group responsible for putting pressure on political leadership with a focus on good governance. The group worked against the re-election of President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan and faulted his electoral reforms. 5 Bakare was not only criticising the political leaders but also speaking to citizens on election matters. In a Sunday morning message titled 'The State of the Nation', he called Nigerians to patriotic action in voting (Bakare 2019). In recent times, even though Bakare remains President Buhari's ally, he condemned nepotism, abuse of human rights and poor governance perpetrated by the Buhari administration. This is evident in his support for the Nigerian youth who demanded the abolition of police brutality (Belo-Osagie 2020). In this case, Bakare challenged the government to fish out state officials who ordered the killing of young Nigerians protesting police brutality and injustice. 6 In July 2021, in his Sunday morning message, he vowed on the pulpit to stage another nationwide protest titled 'Nigeria for Nigerians'. Using the story of Saul as a rejected king in the Old Testament, Bakare states that because of bad governance and oppression of the masses, 'the spirit of God had departed from President Buhari' . In his words 'the highest position in the country is of the citizens and not the president, therefore Nigerians are going to rise and demand their rights' . Bakare upholds that God will anoint another leader as Nigerians rise to fight for their right. Bakare remains the fiercest preacher against military dictatorship, antidemocratic activities, corruption, and human rights abuse in Nigeria. I am a stakeholder in running the affairs of Nigeria by divine election. While I do not belong to any political party, the welfare of Nigeria is uppermost in my heart (Oyedepo 2018:n.p.).

4.Founded in
Earlier in the message, using Ezekiel 3:17-18, Oyedepo states that 'Prophets are God's watchmen not just over people in church but over nations' (Oyedepo 2018). Thus, his political activism may not be unconnected to his claim as a watchman divinely elected by God to pay attention to how the nation is managed (Oyedepo 2017).
Oyedepo speaks boldly against ethnic cleansing, nepotism, land grabbing and other injustice-related issues. He strongly condemned the killings of women and children, pastors, and priests by bandits and herdsmen. He accused the government of making no attempt to arrest the killer-herders because they are the President's kinsmen (Oyedepo 2019). According to Olatunji (2018), Oyedepo maintains that poor governance is responsible for inept political leadership. Oyedepo continues to criticise the leadership of President Buhari. He calls Buhari's government an evil one because it encourages the killing of Christians. He further accuses the government of perpetrating a strategic jihad. Using Psalm 7:11, he proclaims that God is angry with the wicked government. 8 Consequently, Oyedepo calls for the resignation of Buhari (Salimon 2020). In 2020, Oyedepo spoke against the hate speech law formulated by the Buhari-led administration to muzzle the media and critics of bad governance. He calls it a draconian law. Like Bakare, Oyedepo supports the youth protesting against police brutality and injustice across Nigeria. He condemned the killing of protesters in Lekki, Lagos. 9

Paul Adefarasin
As

Enoch Adeboye
As the pastor of the largest Pentecostal church in Nigeria, Pastor Enoch Adeboye of the Redeemed Christian Church of God (RCCG) holds a strong influence over many neo-Pentecostal leaders and millions of Nigerians. 12 Although he is diplomatic, he presents subtle criticism of the government and his comments always come weighty on bad governance. For instance, amid insecurity and killings across Nigeria by herdsmen, rather than confront the government's perceived silence on the carnage, Adeboye leads a prayer procession across the land with a placard that reads 'All souls are precious to God' (Sahara Reporters 2020). This action does not only represent a prayer walk but also a diplomatic criticism of government's insensitivity to unwarranted killings. Shortly after the prayer walk protest, Adeboye took to the media and advised President Buhari to restructure the country and avert disintegration (Channels Television 2020). Meanwhile, restructuring has been a front-burner issue 11.See also https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jb4r3vGdbN0 12. Founded in 1952, RCCG is a global Pentecostal Church, the single largest neo-Pentecostal church in Africa with mega and mushroom branches scattered all over the world. The church hosts the largest Christian gathering annually called 'Holy Ghost Congress'. It has huge political influence as it has produced a Vice President, Cabinet Ministers, Senators, among others. See details at https://neusroom.com/ how-the-redeemed-christian-church-of-god-became-one-of-the-most-influentialchurches-in-modern-history/ raised by the civil society and many regional agitators who felt that the tribe of the President through nepotism had disenfranchised other regions. Indeed, Adeboye demonstrates political activism in agreement with many agitators, sociocultural and civil liberty groups across the county. Also, Adeboye joined the criticism of police brutality (Olufemi 2020). By implication, Adeboye motivates millions of Nigerians to increasingly demand equity, justice, and good governance. Overall, the speeches and messages of the selected neo-Pentecostal leaders delineated in this section show brief historical activities of their pulpit reactions against corruption, social injustice, inequality, poor governance, nepotism, tribalism, and disregard for the rule of law. But the question of theological classification of their pulpit activism remains unanswered. Are they engaging in the SG, political or public theology? The question will be addressed later but, in the meantime, the Nigerian government's reactions will be discussed next.

Government's reaction as evidence of the impact of Nigerian neo-Pentecostal political activism
The response of the government agencies may be a yardstick to determine the effectiveness of NNPA in Nigeria. When constructive political criticism from the pulpit is acceptable to the government, the outcome may be improved governance. As narrated in the preceding section, Adeboye had criticised the government and called for restructuring in Nigeria. Sadly, his opinion was jettisoned. Ekwowusi (2020) reports that Garba Shehu, the Senior Special Assistant to the 13. See details at https://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/top-news/255417oyedepo-enenche-flay-attacks-herdsmen.html President on Media and Publicity described Adeboye's comment as an unpatriotic outburst, unhelpful and unwarranted. He then insisted that the government will not succumb to such a threat and pressure (cf. Daka 2020). Although restructuring may engender a better Nigeria, the resistance to such demand by the government may be a result of the 'approach'. The government perceived Adeboye's call as a threat rather than a contribution. On the one hand, the government's response reveals that the voice of the pulpit activists is loud in the nation. On the other hand, it indicates a counterproductive effort of the pulpit activists. It may then be inferred that confrontational and emotional pulpit actions may not necessarily motivate those in the corridors of power, although church adherents, the masses, civil society groups and related pressure groups can be influenced to intensify pressure in their demand for restructuring.
Furthermore, when the Nigerian National Assembly reviewed the trusteeship clause of the Company Allied Matters Act (CAMA) to check mismanagement among religious and non-governmental organisations, Oyedepo reacted vehemently as the President signed the amendment into law. In response, Bolashodun (2020) reports that Lauretta Onochie, one of the presidential aides in Buhari's administration accused Oyedepo of bullying the government. Clearly, the government perceived Oyedepo's confrontational approach as a bullying exercise on the amended CAMA. Despite Oyedepo's reaction, the amended policy was not reversed. This buttresses this article's earlier assertion that the current NNPA approach can be counterproductive. It shows that Pentecostal pulpit activism has minimal or no impact on the government's actions or inactions. Furthermore, the arrest of Tunde Bakare as discussed earlier and several attempts to detain the likes of Prophet Isa El-Buba and Apostle John Suleman by the Directorate of Secret Service (DSS) are pointers to government reactions. 14 The question then is why are these pulpit activists hunted by the government. Perhaps they have influence over the masses and their words can spark civil reactions. Thus, the government's attempt may be to silence the voices that speak truth to power. It is then not incorrect to infer as a conclusion in this section that NNPA in Nigeria influences and motivates the masses to protest against bad governance, even though their efforts are often resisted by the political elite. The question then remains whether the pulpit activists need to take another approach to influence the government for good governance. This article will now look at the NNPA from a theological perspective discussed next.

Nigerian neo-Pentecostal Political Activism through the lens of theological sub-disciplines
Systematic, historical, biblical, and practical theologies are the main theological branches. With emerging socio-political issues across the globe, theology continues to evolve into sub-disciplines such as SG, black, political, public, liberation, and legal theologies (see Doe 2017:64-70 For Clayton (2014), the key ideology criticised in POT is secularism, that is, the autonomy of a secular realm from religious interests. Correspondingly, Clayton (2014) recommends a radical POT where both religion and politics are up in the air, a position that does not endorse a specific religious perspective, nor dismiss religion or denigrate it as a complex human activity. While Kristen (2019) maintains that POT will be an ongoing conversation, two points were emphasised. Firstly, POT is deeply rooted in Christian or biblical truth. Secondly, POT is an ongoing phenomenon because it has always been a response to emerging situations in human society. By implication, emerging issues in society will continue to inform the evolution of POT. Thus, it will be an ongoing conversation as long as issues arise in human society. 'asking, answering, and acting upon the implications of answers to theological questions related to governance' (Cole 2017 Interpretively, POT in the Nigerian context may be better viewed as the contemplation of the church in conversation with government on issues that promote preferential option for the poor, justice and good governance.
Viewing NNPA with the lens of this article's contextual interpretation of POT vis-a-vis the scholars' opinions discussed here, the narratives show divergence. While POT is a developing Christian ideology rooted in biblical theology as a response to societies' socio-political problems, NNPA appears to be a reaction from the pulpit without specific theology. As the scholars opine, POT is rooted in concerns for the oppressed and alienated individuals, preferential option for the poor, demands for justice and good governance. Thus, the theological argument against NNPA rests on the question: What is the theological base for NNPA?
The brief history of some neo-Pentecostal political activists in Nigeria narrated earlier in this article did not provide an answer to this fundamental question. Rather, it inferred that an emotional reaction born out of Christian conviction, mixed with a sense of human and social rights, and embellished with some scriptures, drives the struggle of the Nigerian neo-Pentecostal pulpit activists. It is noteworthy that emotional reaction, which is expressed in political pulpit activism is fundamental in the Pentecostal culture. It also applies to worship styles, prayers, preaching, prophetic healing and miracles. Therefore, going by the divergence between POT and NNPA, it can be argued that NNPA is not the same as POT.
Nigerian neo-Pentecostal political activism through the lens of public theology Ausaf (1995) defines public theology (PUT) as a: [M]ode of religious-social thought, ethical discourse, and expression of opinion on public issues, chiefly those that concern the understanding and resolution of the problems of contemporary society, polity, economy, the conduct of everyday social life, and the operation of the social, political, and economic institutions in the collective life of people God's bias for the wronged, the lordship of Jesus Christ, and an ethic of hybridity. To fulfil a transforming and humanising role in contemporary society, Koopman (2015:23) claims that 'public theology needs to stand where God stands -namely, with the wronged and against dehumanisation, injustice, and oppression'.
While POT may give preference to Christianity and its dogma, PUT differs as it gives preference to the inclusivity of religions. In the assertion of Jayme (2016) and De Gruchy (2007), PUT focuses on the common good of all (Christians and non-Christians). Correspondingly, Ausaf (1995:72) explains that it does not represent the imposition upon a religiously pluralistic society a specific sectarian creed. For De Gruchy (2007), public theology requires informed knowledge of 'public policy' on issues arising. Concurrently, it requires a sharp equivalent analytical evaluation of such issues using theological critique. Jayme (2016) further explains that PUT underscores the suffering and oppression of people and communities, and that it speaks to their pain and comfort via the message of hope and solidarity. It equally weighs the action of perpetrators of such oppression and speaks to them through prophetic rebuke and recommendation of the ideal in a clear ethical and theological view. Ausaf (1995:70) further claims that PUT has a prophetic mode that concerns itself with the basic concepts, issues, and problems of the social order, such as racism, oppression, bigotry, injustice, poverty, exploitation, inequity, morality, family, education, among others. The prophetic mode is an attempt to bring back the concerns of the prophets of the Old Testament and the compassion and love of Jesus. On the operational procedure, Ausaf asserts that PUT is firstly 'dialogical, but not relativistic' (Ausaf 1995:72). By implication, public theologians, whether professorial or priestly, depend exclusively on the method of rational persuasion. In this regard, they do not coerce others to gain support for their favourite public policies. Rather they allow theoretical understanding and robust discussion to constitute the preferred method of PUT. 19 At the same time, they do not just depend on the do's and the don'ts from the revealed texts or religious law books; they incorporate their environment's circumstances in their discussions. Secondly, they reach a 'Consensus' via reflection in their discussions, especially on the basic constitution of society and the concept of righteous social life (Ausaf 1995:72).
Given the explanations discussed here, there are similarities between POT and PUT. Agreeably, Jayme (2016) observes that PUT will be political because it is very little in the way it is not political. However, Sebastian (2011:21-22) holds that when it comes to working in the public space with people of other religions, PUT is a more effective construct to communicate the ideals of inclusion, social justice, and the way religion supports or speaks against evil. Consequently, 19. Part of the process of rational persuasion is seen in the effort of Late Vuyani Vellem's robust, scholarly, and articulate discussions in public theology that critique the policies of the post 1994 government on urbanisation (Vellem 2014:1-6).
while POT and PUT may have some similarities, NNPA is not rooted in the duo. The divergence between NNPA and PUT is clear. As discussed earlier, some neo-Pentecostal pulpit activists use a confrontational approach which is often perceived by the government as 'emotional outburst and bullying'. Likewise, perceiving Adeboye and Oyedepo's statements as unpatriotic, emotional, and bullying implies that the NNPA does not engage in rational persuasion, consensus, and multireligious approach. Thus, NNPA is not rooted in PUT. As mentioned earlier NNPA appears to be a combination of conviction-led emotional reaction, a sense of human and social rights, embellished with a few scriptures to drive the demand for good governance. Nigerian neo-Pentecostal Political Activism is reactive, emotional, and confrontational, whereas PUT is rational and persuasive. By implication, NNPA is not the same with nor connected to PUT. Oshatz (2021) accounts that SG was a movement led by liberal Protestant progressives in response to the social problems caused by the rapid industrialisation, urbanisation, and increasing immigration of the Gilded Age. Social gospel prioritises social salvation over individual salvation. Although the heralds of the social gospel based their appeals on liberal theology, they usually showed more interest in social science than in theology. However, the difference between them and secular activists remains their vision, not just to see an equitable power balance but a Christian society where social-economic classes' conflict, competition and greed are substituted by cooperation, mutual respect, and compassion. According to Dorn (1967), the SG activists claim that to honour God, personal earthly desires must be set aside and concerns for others especially the needy must come to the fore. They condemned hoarding wealth and encouraged sharing with the less fortunate in society. Beyond agitations, they provided settlement houses and numerous opportunities to the less privileged including access to education, free or low-cost healthcare, and housing, among others. Regarding 'approach', Painter (2008) relates as an example the effort of Washington Gladden, the leading advocate of the SG in America who encouraged his congregants to play an active role in community life by attacking immorality in their fellow citizens and government officials. Furthermore, Oshatz (2021) reports that by the mid-1890s, the SG had the support of multiple denominations and a strong foothold in interdenominational organisations.

Nigerian neo-Pentecostal political activism through the lens of social gospel
Examining NNPA with the lens of the SG, it becomes clear that 'confrontation' and a united voice in social action are two points of convergence. However, there are weightier points of departure. Firstly, the SG advocates encourage sharing with the less privileged and confront hoarding wealth. Whereas some of the Nigerian neo-Pentecostal activists including a few discussed earlier under the brief history section, encourage wealth accumulation and flamboyant lifestyles. 20 Secondly, while SG focuses on critiquing government officials, and fighting for the rights and welfare of the underprivileged in communities, the NNPA focuses on the incompetence of political authority with less attention to individuals and communities. On a priority scale, unity of purpose in a confrontational approach cannot outweigh the import of providing community social service while concurrently confronting social-political injustice. Thus, NNPA is technically not the same as SG. Why? Social gospel champions focus on piety, non-materialistic culture, taking responsibility for social and community development as against the NNPA where wealth accumulation, less attention for social and community development and confronting the government for non-performance is the order of the day. Overall, in this section, each subsection argues that NNPA is not the same as SG, POT and PUT. This article will now make some recommendations in the next section.

Recommendations
Noticeably, the Nigerian pulpit activists confront dictatorship, corruption, human rights violations, police brutality, ethnocentric and electoral injustices, nepotism, ethnic cleansing, anti-freedom of speech policies and disrespect for the rule of law. While their genuine intentions are commendable, 'confrontation' which in itself can be seen as a prophetic action as in the case of South Africa, may not be sufficient to influence the political class to deliver good governance (see Koopman 2015;Vellem 2014:1-6). This then calls for a theological review of the pulpit activists' modus operandi. Firstly, the neo-Pentecostal pulpit activists need to ask if their struggle is grounded in theology. Secondly, the purpose of their action must be defined. In this regard, they need to make it clear if their purpose is to engender political reform or provoke good governance. If the answer is affirmative, a conversation that addresses theological questions on PPA must be brought forward as a strategy to close the theological gap. Using the position of Jayme (2016) and Sebastian (2011:21-22), among others, this article recommends that such a theological gap can be closed chiefly by developing or adopting specific theology for a sociopolitical struggle against bad governance. For example, concepts can be adopted from PUT, especially the rational and persuasive approach discussed earlier while viewing NNPA with the lens of PUT. Where prophetic actions fail, rational and persuasive alternatives can provide result-oriented struggle. Even though a tailor-made theology for the Nigerian context is imperative, this article posits that tested and tried theological concepts with results in other contexts cannot be ignored in the Nigerian struggle. Below are further practical recommendations.

Change of approach: From confrontation to interaction, dialogue, and partnership
Confrontation as a form of prophetic action worked in other climes such as South Africa; however, if it does not produce 20. See their accumulation of wealth in Orogun (2020:102-140). See details at https:// repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/85751; See also Orogun and Pillay (2021).
results in Nigeria, the flexibility of the pulpit activists can allow the use of alternatives such as dialogue and partnership as discussed earlier while critiquing NNPA with the lens of POT and PUT. Given the history of how political crises snowball into religious killings and vice-versa, pulpit activism in Nigeria demands caution. 21 Confrontation can create unnecessary political tension and snowball into religious riots and killings across the country. To avoid such, decorum and words salted with grace as encouraged in Colossians 4:6 are necessary. In a sensitive clime such as Nigeria, the pulpit should not be used as a war desk. The corrections, caution, and criticism from the pulpit must have an underlining purpose -to repair and not to destroy. More so, as earlier mentioned, dialogue with political leaders from the ward to the federal level should be an alternative approach. The two cities' interaction models of the secular and spiritual or church and state discussed earlier while critiquing NNPA with the lenses of POT and PUT suggest the need for collaborative interaction. Also, going by Pillay's counsel, dialogue may require partnership. In his words 'In addressing poverty, the church needs to recognise that it needs to have partnerships with government, business and society' (Pillay 2015: 8). With dialogue and partnership, the pulpit activists may influence the political class to provide good governance.

Neo-Pentecostal political activism must be ideological
The brief description of the history, definitions and concepts of POT and PUT mentioned earlier shows that theological indices are utilised in the formation of philosophies for political sovereignty. There must be a theological ideology in the neo-Pentecostal socio-political struggle. Such ideology needs to transcend a Christian view; it needs to consider legal, social, cultural, historical, and multireligious matrices that fall within the most moral and ethical principles of righteous and social life for all. 22 Concomitantly, the PUT section of this article points to the imperativeness of acquiring knowledge in 'public policy' on issues arising and a sharp equivalent analytical evaluation of such issues using theological critique. This ideological concept is a replicable model for NNPA. Rather than an emotional and nonideological response to government's policies, analytical evaluation, theological and non-confrontational critique can be alternatives. Open rebuke without ideological substance cannot induce any positive change in the socio-political space.

Neo-Pentecostal pulpit activists need to embrace the 'charity begins at home' culture
There is a need to show more examples. Issues of injustices, tribalism, ethnocentrisms, abuse of the rights of adherents, 21. See historical record of religious crisis and socio-political influence at https://www.accord.org.za/ajcr-issues/religious-violence-in-nigeria/ and https:// www.sciencespo.fr/ceri/fr/oir/ethnicity-politics-land-religion-and-deadly-clashesjos-nigeria 22. Legal matrices suggest that neo-Pentecostal pulpit activists need a comprehensive knowledge of public policy and constitution while critiquing and interacting with government officials.
associates, and staff through wrong application of spiritual authority doctrine and dictatorship must be addressed. When charity begins at home, there will be an increased moral authority to speak truth to power. As described earlier under PUT section, the concerns of academics and priests in PUT include addressing issues related to racism, oppression, bigotry, injustice, poverty, exploitation, and inequity, among others. By implication, responding to socio-political issues goes beyond confronting an oppressive government and related perpetrators, but also providing socio-economic support to affected communities (Christian and non-Christians). Equally, as Pillay (2015:7) advised, the church has two responsibilities, namely to 'change and challenge oppressive and dehumanising structures and systems in society'. Consequently, neo-Pentecostal political activists need to constructively challenge perpetrators on the one hand and change the situations in communities on the other hand. To engender good governance and positively changing situations in communities require partnership with the government and other stakeholders.

The pulpit activists need to embrace citizenship engagement
From the earlier historical narrative of the NNPA, the pulpit activists focus more on what the political elites should do to engender good governance. Given the resistance, 'citizenship engagement' can be an alternative. When the political class jettisons the call for good governance, engagement with citizens and voters, training and teaching the citizens on their rights to decide who governs them will change the political atmosphere. Nigerian neo-Pentecostal political activism should not be about the elites in power alone but also those who voted them in power. Thus, concentration on citizenship rights, persuasive voter education and inspiring citizens' ballot power can be the game changer. With this strategy, bad governance can be addressed through electorates' decisions. Thus, bad leaders can be changed without any counterproductive emotional reaction from the pulpit.

Conclusion
This article showed that NNPA under theological examination had little or no influence on the elites in power. However, it can provoke mass socio-political actions by the electorates, civil society, and other pressure groups. Furthermore, while such activism comes with genuine intention, it may remain counterproductive in relation to those in power if confrontation (an emotional expression characterised as Pentecostal liturgy) remains the only strategy to speak truth to power. Thus, where a struggle for good governance from a Christian perspective lacks a solid theological foundation, its approach may remain counterproductive. Finally, the article recommends the need for a strong theological foundation, flexibility of approach and the integration of good concepts mainly from PUT and subsequently from the SG and POT.