Original Research

Is intelligent design science, and does it matter?

P W Bateman, J M M-Ellis
Verbum et Ecclesia | Vol 28, No 1 | a94 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v28i1.94 | © 2007 P W Bateman, J M M-Ellis | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 17 September 2007 | Published: 17 November 2007

About the author(s)

P W Bateman, University of Pretoria
J M M-Ellis, University of Surrey

Full Text:

PDF (82KB)

Share this article

Bookmark and Share


The debate between evolution and intelligent design is usually presented by evolutionary biologists as a clash between science and non-science (creationism and religion) and therefore as a sterile argument which science wins by default. Countering this is intelligent design (ID) and irreducible complexity (IC) which posit that the diversity and complexity of life on earth indicates the hand of a designer, although the nature of that designer is not speculated on. In doing so, proponents of  ID and IC bring the argument squarely into the scientific camp and fulfil the requirements of being science, although this is difficult  to define. Here, we discuss the claims of ID and IC to provide an alternative to evolution and propose that science can adequately deal with and refute these claims. At the same time, ID and IC fulfil an important role as foils
to ‘scientism’  – the belief that science is the best way of answering all questions. In the final analysis, however , despite their value in the debate, ID and IC are not found to be robust or reliable enough to replace evolution as the best way of explaining the diversity of life on earth.


No related keywords in the metadata.


Total abstract views: 1512
Total article views: 2524

Crossref Citations

No related citations found.