Original Research

Die kontoere van 'n weerwoord

J.H. le Roux
Verbum et Ecclesia | Skrif en Kerk: Vol 16, No 1 | a441 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v16i1.441 | © 1995 J.H. le Roux | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 20 September 1995 | Published: 20 September 1995

Full Text:

PDF (921KB)

Share this article

Bookmark and Share

Abstract

The outline of an answer. This article is a response to J A Loader's evaluation of my book, "A story of two ways". It is argued that neither Loader nor any other scholar referred to in the book were deliberately belittled or degraded. Every Old Testament scholar mentioned in "Story" was depicted with the greatest respect and a sincere attempt was made to understand each one. Loader is therefore accused of a one-sided Loader-centric reading. To illustrate my point some important aspects with regard to "Story" are highlighted: the intention of the book, the way in which the book received its name, the problems attached to contemporary history writing, etcetera. The main part of the paper consists of an investigation into Loader's historical approach to the Old Testament.


Keywords

No related keywords in the metadata.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 1357
Total article views: 1587

Reader Comments

Before posting a comment, read our privacy policy.

Post a comment (login required)

Crossref Citations

No related citations found.