Original Research

The destruction of the nations and the promise of return: hermeneutical observations on the book of Deuteronomy

G Braulik
Verbum et Ecclesia | Vol 25, No 1 | a259 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v25i1.259 | © 2004 G Braulik | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 03 October 2004 | Published: 05 October 2004

Full Text:

PDF (456KB)

Share this article

Bookmark and Share


Many Israelis, but also many Christian Palestinians, today understand the current conflict around the possession of the land in a Bible-oriented way. They associate it with the radical destruction of all inhabitants of the land and its subsequent occupation as it is formulated in Deuteronomy, namely as an instruction of God, and as portrayed in the book of Joshua, namely as an historical event. This typologising form of  common hermeneutics contradicts both modern historiography on ancient Israel and the historic-critical exegesis of the two books as well as their interpretation in Jewish tradition. The campaign of the twelve-tribe nation under Joshua and the destruction of the peoples of Canaan is a  theological,  fictitious  image of radical trust in God, which was designed under King Josiah for mythical ancient times. Neither the laws on warfare nor the promises of return in a synchronically read Deuteronomy know about any future violent conquest of  the  land of Canaan. The article analyses Israel's relation to the inhabitants of the land, especially in  chapters 29-30, which are decisive for Moses’ vision of the  future.  Based on this analysis, it develops the hermeneutics of Deuteronomy  for  the directives on the destruction of the nations. Applying these directives typologically proves to  be  ruled  out, both for the wars following the conquest of the land and for the return of Israel from exile.


No related keywords in the metadata.


Total abstract views: 1502
Total article views: 2489


Crossref Citations

1. Recent Research on Warfare in the Old Testament
Charles Trimm
Currents in Biblical Research  vol: 10  issue: 2  first page: 171  year: 2012  
doi: 10.1177/1476993X11405906