Original Research

Can a major religion change? Reading Genesis 1–3 in the twenty-first century1

IJJ Spangenberg
Verbum et Ecclesia | Vol 28, No 1 | a107 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v28i1.107 | © 2007 IJJ Spangenberg | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 17 September 2007 | Published: 17 November 2007

Full Text:

PDF (163KB)

Share this article

Bookmark and Share

Abstract

Ever since the fourth century Christian theologians read Genesis 1–3 as a historical account about creation and fall. Augustine (354–430), one of the Latin fathers of the Church, introduced the idea of “original sin” on account of his reading of these chapters. According to him God created a perfect world which collapsed because of the sin of  Adam and Eve. This idea became a fixed doctrine in the Roman Catholic and Protestant Churches.  The doctrine holds that every human being, by the very fact of birth, inherits a “tainted” nature in need of regeneration. Since the paradigm shift in Biblical Studies which occurred towards the end of the nineteenth century, the doctrine has come under severe criticism by Old  Testament scholars. In recent years even systematic
theologians are questioning the interpretation of  Augustine and proclaim: “There is no fall in Scripture.” This issue is discussed in detail and an answer is given to the question whether Christians can accept other readings and whether Christianity can change.

Keywords

No related keywords in the metadata.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 1720
Total article views: 2446

 

Crossref Citations

1. Rethinking sin and evil through the life of a child sex slave
Chris Jones
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies  vol: 72  issue: 1  year: 2016  
doi: 10.4102/hts.v72i1.3522